<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bad Case of Liberty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/</link>
	<description>@ Rational Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Neil Schulman</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Neil Schulman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=3067#comment-408</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-402&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Charles:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;There probably are “millions” of us who have read and comprehend the Constitution.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alas, I suspect there are “tens-of-millions” who’s only reading of the document was in middle school where it’s “meaning” was carefully explained to young and impressionable minds. Especially that “Balance of Powers” stuff. It sorta explains some of those inconsistencies.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Finally, there are “hundreds-of-millions” who are dependent upon the state and ANY talk of unalienable rights is “Ivory Tower.”&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Can the middle-class prevail against the over and under classes who feed on them?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;As you seem to point out, only by some form of “Gulching”, really. But talk about not gonna happen.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I am TOTALLY carried away speculating on what would be coming out of those garages should open war break out.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;
I don&#039;t need to discuss &quot;gulching&quot; when my own novel, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alongsidenight.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alongside Night&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, offers a strategic alternative that doesn&#039;t require retreating to a valley in Colorado. Of course I&#039;m living in a valley in Nevada, so maybe I&#039;m not the one to refute this idea. :-)
&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="#comment-402" rel="nofollow"><br />
<strong><em>Charles:</em></strong><br />
</a></p>
<p><strong>There probably are “millions” of us who have read and comprehend the Constitution.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Alas, I suspect there are “tens-of-millions” who’s only reading of the document was in middle school where it’s “meaning” was carefully explained to young and impressionable minds. Especially that “Balance of Powers” stuff. It sorta explains some of those inconsistencies.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Finally, there are “hundreds-of-millions” who are dependent upon the state and ANY talk of unalienable rights is “Ivory Tower.”</strong></p>
<p><strong>Can the middle-class prevail against the over and under classes who feed on them?</strong></p>
<p><strong>As you seem to point out, only by some form of “Gulching”, really. But talk about not gonna happen.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I am TOTALLY carried away speculating on what would be coming out of those garages should open war break out.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong><br />
I don&#8217;t need to discuss &#8220;gulching&#8221; when my own novel, <em><a href="http://www.alongsidenight.net" rel="nofollow">Alongside Night</a></em>, offers a strategic alternative that doesn&#8217;t require retreating to a valley in Colorado. Of course I&#8217;m living in a valley in Nevada, so maybe I&#8217;m not the one to refute this idea. <img src='http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Neil Schulman</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Neil Schulman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=3067#comment-406</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dave Hardy pointed out to be that I&#039;d misread the transcript. The &quot;law professor&quot; quip was Justice Scalia&#039;s, not Roberts. I&#039;ve corrected the text of the article accordingly.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dave Hardy pointed out to be that I&#8217;d misread the transcript. The &#8220;law professor&#8221; quip was Justice Scalia&#8217;s, not Roberts. I&#8217;ve corrected the text of the article accordingly.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A bad case of liberty &#171; Coreys Views</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>A bad case of liberty &#171; Coreys Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=3067#comment-404</guid>
		<description>[...] Link: http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: <a href="http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/" rel="nofollow">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=3067#comment-402</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;There probably are &quot;millions&quot; of us who have read and comprehend the Constitution.

Alas, I suspect there are &quot;tens-of-millions&quot; who&#039;s only reading of the document was in middle school where it&#039;s &quot;meaning&quot; was carefully explained to young and impressionable minds. Especially that &quot;Balance of Powers&quot; stuff. It sorta explains some of those inconsistencies.

Finally, there are &quot;hundreds-of-millions&quot; who are dependent upon the state and ANY talk of unalienable rights is &quot;Ivory Tower.&quot;

Can the middle-class prevail against the over and under classes who feed on them?

As you seem to point out, only by some form of &quot;Gulching&quot;, really. But talk about not gonna happen.

I am TOTALLY carried away speculating on what would be coming out of those garages should open war break out.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>There probably are &#8220;millions&#8221; of us who have read and comprehend the Constitution.</p>
<p>Alas, I suspect there are &#8220;tens-of-millions&#8221; who&#8217;s only reading of the document was in middle school where it&#8217;s &#8220;meaning&#8221; was carefully explained to young and impressionable minds. Especially that &#8220;Balance of Powers&#8221; stuff. It sorta explains some of those inconsistencies.</p>
<p>Finally, there are &#8220;hundreds-of-millions&#8221; who are dependent upon the state and ANY talk of unalienable rights is &#8220;Ivory Tower.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can the middle-class prevail against the over and under classes who feed on them?</p>
<p>As you seem to point out, only by some form of &#8220;Gulching&#8221;, really. But talk about not gonna happen.</p>
<p>I am TOTALLY carried away speculating on what would be coming out of those garages should open war break out.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bad Case of Liberty « J. Neil Schulman Federal Me</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>A Bad Case of Liberty « J. Neil Schulman Federal Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=3067#comment-401</guid>
		<description>[...] original here:  A Bad Case of Liberty « J. Neil Schulman         tags: attorney, chicago, city, federal court, from-the-oppression, oppression, plaintiff, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] original here:  A Bad Case of Liberty « J. Neil Schulman         tags: attorney, chicago, city, federal court, from-the-oppression, oppression, plaintiff, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2010/03/a-bad-case-of-liberty/feed/ ) in 0.19418 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 8:32 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 9:32 am UTC -->
