<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exposing the Warm Mongers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/</link>
	<description>@ Rational Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Neil Schulman</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/comment-page-1/#comment-2987</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Neil Schulman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=713#comment-2987</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2976&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pete McAlpine:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Neil, it would be good to add to your perfect comments above that “scientific consensus” for global warming (such as it is) was bought and paid for by the UN and other statist entities seeking to use it as an excuse for their agenda:  Orwell’s JACKBOOT ON HUMANITY you mentioned.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Further, it should always be mentioned that OPEC and the BIG OIL firms amongst other interests profit from global warming propaganda to the extent it effects policy and limits production, thus keeping up the price.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The textbook definition of monopoly power is when a firm or industry achieves higher profits by restricting production than by increasing it!  Big Oil often claims to want more production, but, interestingly, spends ZERO money on bribing Congress to open-up production.  The pro-global warming propaganda  expenditures and environmentalist propaganda in general is laundered through the great Foundations, etc.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;
I wish it were true that the &quot;global warming&quot; coalition buying scientific consensus had no buyers from the right. Unfortunately, it&#039;s not true. Margaret Thatcher was an early proponent. Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Mitt Romney have all said they believe in global warming and lent support to cap &amp; trade -- and I&#039;m getting early reports from analysis of her emails that as governor of Alaska Sarah Palin did, too.
&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="#comment-2976" rel="nofollow"><br />
<strong><em>Pete McAlpine:</em></strong><br />
</a></p>
<p><strong>Neil, it would be good to add to your perfect comments above that “scientific consensus” for global warming (such as it is) was bought and paid for by the UN and other statist entities seeking to use it as an excuse for their agenda:  Orwell’s JACKBOOT ON HUMANITY you mentioned.</strong></p>
<p><strong></p>
<p>Further, it should always be mentioned that OPEC and the BIG OIL firms amongst other interests profit from global warming propaganda to the extent it effects policy and limits production, thus keeping up the price.</p>
<p></strong>
<p><strong>The textbook definition of monopoly power is when a firm or industry achieves higher profits by restricting production than by increasing it!  Big Oil often claims to want more production, but, interestingly, spends ZERO money on bribing Congress to open-up production.  The pro-global warming propaganda  expenditures and environmentalist propaganda in general is laundered through the great Foundations, etc.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong><br />
I wish it were true that the &#8220;global warming&#8221; coalition buying scientific consensus had no buyers from the right. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s not true. Margaret Thatcher was an early proponent. Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Mitt Romney have all said they believe in global warming and lent support to cap &#038; trade &#8212; and I&#8217;m getting early reports from analysis of her emails that as governor of Alaska Sarah Palin did, too.<br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete McAlpine</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/comment-page-1/#comment-2977</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete McAlpine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=713#comment-2977</guid>
		<description>Woops:  laundered, not laudered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops:  laundered, not laudered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete McAlpine</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/comment-page-1/#comment-2976</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete McAlpine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=713#comment-2976</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Neil, it would be good to add to your perfect comments above that &quot;scientific consensus&quot; for global warming (such as it is) was bought and paid for by the UN and other statist entities seeking to use it as an excuse for their agenda:  Orwell&#039;s JACKBOOT ON HUMANITY you mentioned.

Further, it should always be mentioned that OPEC and the BIG OIL firms amongst other interests profit from global warming propaganda to the extent it effects policy and limits production, thus keeping up the price.

The textbook definition of monopoly power is when a firm or industry achieves higher profits by restricting production than by increasing it!  Big Oil often claims to want more production, but, interestingly, spends ZERO money on bribing Congress to open-up production.  The pro-global warming propaganda  expenditures and environmentalist propaganda in general is laundered through the great Foundations, etc.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Neil, it would be good to add to your perfect comments above that &#8220;scientific consensus&#8221; for global warming (such as it is) was bought and paid for by the UN and other statist entities seeking to use it as an excuse for their agenda:  Orwell&#8217;s JACKBOOT ON HUMANITY you mentioned.</p>
<p>Further, it should always be mentioned that OPEC and the BIG OIL firms amongst other interests profit from global warming propaganda to the extent it effects policy and limits production, thus keeping up the price.</p>
<p>The textbook definition of monopoly power is when a firm or industry achieves higher profits by restricting production than by increasing it!  Big Oil often claims to want more production, but, interestingly, spends ZERO money on bribing Congress to open-up production.  The pro-global warming propaganda  expenditures and environmentalist propaganda in general is laundered through the great Foundations, etc.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PermaKent Permaculture Ideas of J. Kent Hastings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kite Based Wind Power Generation</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>PermaKent Permaculture Ideas of J. Kent Hastings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kite Based Wind Power Generation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=713#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] lean against the &#8220;warm mongers&#8221; position (as J. Neil Schulman calls the alarmists), but realize I could be wrong. There are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lean against the &#8220;warm mongers&#8221; position (as J. Neil Schulman calls the alarmists), but realize I could be wrong. There are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exposing the warm mongers &#171; Coreys Views</title>
		<link>http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Exposing the warm mongers &#171; Coreys Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/?p=713#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] More: http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More: <a href="http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/" rel="nofollow">http://jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  jneilschulman.rationalreview.com/2009/11/exposing-the-warm-mongers/feed/ ) in 0.34308 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 8:37 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 9:37 am UTC -->
